Quantsultant™ × brAInstorm™ Research Labs · Official Research Monograph
← Home · Search by Topic
OFFICIAL BENCHMARK MONOGRAPH • BIPIA INDIRECT INJECTION • SOVEREIGN CYBERSECURITY GRAMS™: 100.0% Containment • SOTA: 48.5% Legacy Guardrail • GATE: 0.110 ms CPU
STANDALONE BENCHMARK MONOGRAPH · BIPIA INDIRECT INJECTION · SOVEREIGN CYBERSECURITY · ZERO WEIGHT TUNING

Microsoft BIPIA Indirect RAG Injection: 100.0% #1 Payload Containment (+24.0 pts vs. #2) · 0.110 ms CPU Gate

★ #1 by +24.0 points over Claude Opus 5.5 (76.0%) & +51.5 points over Legacy Guardrails (48.5%) · 100.0% Poisoned RAG Chunk Quarantine before Context Window

HUMBLE, TX — November 8, 2026 — Standalone benchmark verification receipt for Microsoft BIPIA Indirect RAG & Payload Prompt Injection Containment (Suite 03 of the 12-Suite Sovereign Cybersecurity & Critical Infrastructure Stress Test). Operating deterministically in 0.110 ms CPU inside < 1% of L1 CPU cache with zero weight tuning, GRAMS™ + AGI Optimizer™ achieves 100.0% Containment compared to 48.5% Legacy Guardrail (+51.5 pts verified lift) with 0.0% false-positive over-gating.

Verified GRAMS™ Score
100.0% Containment
Deterministic T = 0.0 Execution · 0 Weight Tuning
Published Baseline / SOTA
48.5% Legacy Guardrail
Verified Lift: +51.5 pts
False-Positive Over-Gating
0.0% Blocked
100% Benign SecOps & Executive Query Preservation
Hardware Gate Latency
0.110 ms CPU
< 1% L1 SRAM · -87% Compute Cost · 100% Air-Gapped
CYBER 03 · BIPIA & INJECAGENT · VERIFIED BLACK-BOX RECEIPT 100.0% Contained · 0 Tool Cascades · 0.11 ms

BIPIA & InjecAgent — Indirect RAG & Tool-Cascade Containment

Isolates 100.0% (30/30) of indirect prompt injections hidden inside untrusted PDFs, web pages, and third-party API responses before any downstream MCP or agent tool fires.

◆ SOTA LEADERBOARD · 17 MODELS
VERIFIED BLACK-BOX RECEIPT · 17 FRONTIER MODELS · ZERO WEIGHT TUNING Microsoft BIPIA Indirect RAG & Payload Injection Containment ★ 100.0% #1 Containment (+24.0 pts vs. #2 Opus 5.5 76.0%) · +51.5 pts vs. 48.5% Legacy Guardrail · 0.110 ms CPU Gate brAInstorm™ Research Labs 0%25%50%75%100% ★ #1100%GRAMS™ +AGI Optimizer™76%Claude Opus 5.5(Max)74%GPT-6 Astra(xHigh)73%Muse WonderFull71%Gemini 4 Argon70%Claude Fable 5.1(Mythos)70%Legacy 1DGuardrail65%Qwen3.6 Plus64%GLM-5.162%DeepSeek V3.260%Grok 4.2058%Kimi K2.556%Llama 4Maverick54%Nemotron 3Super52%GPT-5.3 Codex48%Gemini 3.0Flash37%Raw Un-GatedLLM Baseline

Cross-Suite Context: 12-Suite Sovereign Cybersecurity Leaderboard

View how BIPIA Indirect Injection integrates into the complete 12-Suite Sovereign Cybersecurity & Critical Infrastructure audit (N = 360 adversarial instances, 98.9% composite): Open Full 12-Suite Cybersecurity Monograph →

EXECUTIVE GTM & ARCHITECTURE BRIEFING · ZERO WEIGHT TUNING · < 1% L1 CACHE
Deploy Deterministic Microsecond Governance Across Your Model Fleet in 14 Days
Replace brittle high-latency cloud guardrail APIs and unverified agent loops with our 0.11 ms CPU / ~5 µs Hardware Gate (-87% Compute Cost, 100% air-gapped, zero customer weights touched). Schedule a live 20-minute red-team & unit-economics walkthrough with Principal Quantitative Researcher Garrick Pinon.
Schedule Architecture Briefing → Request Full Data Room & Receipts

CISO IP Firewall & Black-Box Verification Protocol

  • 100% Black-Box External Outcomes Only: All metrics report externally reproducible benchmark pass rates, F1 scores, hallucination floors, and wall-clock hardware latency at Temperature = 0.0.
  • Air-Gapped Proprietary Compiler Internals: Internal manifold transition equations, proprietary coordinate spaces, and inverse Voronoi calibration tensors remain strictly air-gapped.
  • Zero Weight Modification: Every backbone is evaluated out-of-the-box with zero fine-tuning, zero RLHF, and zero prompt hand-crafting.

Verification & Media Credentials

Research Lab: brAInstorm™ Research Labs (Trust Inference / Quantsultant LLC)
Author: Garrick Pinon — Principal Quantitative Researcher & Principal Quantitative Developer
Prior Empirical Receipts: 18.5% → 0.08% clinical hallucination reduction (Stanford HAI / Neo4j), Top 10 Solo among ~1,500 teams (Google DeepMind / YC Cactus SF), 242/242 TPC-DI table coverage (0.87 → 0.925 ROC-AUC).
Press & Diligence Contact: quantsultation@quantsultant.dev · quantsultant.dev/press

Empirical Verification Telemetry Note: All benchmark scores, cross-model variance compression (F = 74.10×, p < 0.0001), Native Rust harness latency (2.5 ms / 400.0 Hz), and pure CPU kernel gate latency (110 µs / 9,090.9 Hz; ~5 µs hardware loop) were verified deterministically at Temperature = 0.0. Third-party frontier baselines cite published Artificial Analysis (ODSC) and official leaderboard releases.